The Walt Disney Company has been at odds with Florida Governor Ron DeSantis ever since the company spoke out against Florida’s Parental Rights Bill (or what critics call the “Don’t Say Gay” bill) that the governor eventually signed into law.
Governor DeSantis retaliated against the company by threatening to dissolve Disney World’s Reedy Creek Improvement District, which allowed Disney World to act as its own county government. The Governor’s efforts to dissolve the district were successful, and a bill was passed to do so. Now, where do things stand with this situation?
First, there are a lot of questions as to what this means for everyone involved, including questions about who will take on Disney’s nearly $1 billion debt. Here’s the latest of what we know so far.
Who Will Control The Reedy Creek District?
Previously, Governor DeSantis said that “the state will likely assume control of Disney World’s Reedy Creek Improvement District, rather than the local governments absorbing it.” At the time, the governor was working on a proposal with more specifics.
However, the Governor has still not given out any specific details about that plan. According to The Orlando Business Journal, he has continued to be clear that he would not allow county governments to take control of the district. At a May 2022 event at Seminole State College, he said:
“More likely, the state will simply assume control and make sure we’re able to impose the law and make sure we’re collecting the taxes … There’s a whole bunch of different things we will be able to do. I’d much rather have the state leading that effort than potentially having local governments … I’m worried they would use that as a pretext to raise taxes on people when that’s what they would want to do anyway, and then try to blame Reedy Creek. We’re not going to give them that opportunity. “
However, the Governor has still not offered up any further information as to what the plan might entail for taking over the District.
UPDATE: According to Bloomberg, Ben Watkins, director of the state’s division of bond finance, said the likely outcome will be a successor district created by legislators. It will probably assume most of the powers Reedy Creek held that allow Disney to perform municipal functions. With that being said, it can be expected that previously-granted powers that were never used, such as operating a nuclear power plant, will not be authorized.
Click Here to Learn More About the Possibility of a Successor District
So What’s The Plan?
On July 11th, 2022, The Orlando Business Journal contacted Governor DeSantis’ office regarding an ongoing lawsuit. Bryan Griffin, a spokesperson with that office wrote, “The text of the bill that removes the special district states that the dissolution isn’t effective until June 1, 2023. As always promised, the debts of the Reedy Creek Improvement District will not fall to the local residents. When we do have more to share, we [will] make a formal announcement at that time.”
However, Griffin, and the senators who sponsored the bill, were not available for comment.
Many lawmakers and experts have come forward with criticisms of the bill, while others are concerned about the lack of a clear plan for moving forward.
Update on Lawsuit Against Governor DeSantis
Taxpayers from counties that surround Disney World filed a complaint in federal court against Governor DeSantis about the issue, stating that the law to dissolve the Reedy Creek Improvement District was made in haste. These taxpayers shared concerns that it would leave counties with a huge amount of debt and that it violated Disney’s First Amendment rights as it was retaliatory against the company’s statement against the “Don’t Say Gay” bill.
A federal judge quickly dismissed the lawsuit, though, because the law doesn’t go into effect until June 1st, 2023 and because the federal court doesn’t have jurisdiction over issues affecting the state. The judge also claimed that the plaintiffs “do not plausibly allege they have suffered any concrete injury as a result of the alleged violation of Disney’s First Amendment rights.”
However, according to The Orlando Business Journal, that lawsuit was refiled in May, with that case scheduled to go before a judge in July. As of now, it is expected to be delayed until August. The Attorneys representing the plaintiffs have stated that they are waiting to see if the state will file a motion to dismiss, as well as if DeSantis will offer an update on his plan for the District.
So at the moment, Governor DeSantis has not given many details on his plan regarding the Reedy Creek District other than saying that the state will take over. The lawsuit’s status is still hanging in the balance until it is either dismissed or goes forward.
We’ll be sure to keep you updated on the situation. In the meantime, here are MORE things that could change Disney’s future.
Tom says
I can’t imagine that this is something DeSantis actually expects to go through with. I feel it is just a move in a big chess game, a shot at checking Disney and letting them know that they stepped on feet. It will more likely be used as a bargaining tool to get them to back off on the rhetoric over the parents rights in education bill, and perhaps more so, just to get DeSantis in the spotlight on the national level . I will be really surprised if Reedy Creek is actually dissolved.
CC says
Following
Todd says
It is no surprise that DeSantis was immature and wanted to retaliate. He had the votes to make this happen, but our course has no idea what to do now and it will turn into a mess if left in the hands of the government. Desolving Reedy Creek would be very unfortunate for everyone. Let’s hope Disney gets the last laugh and Desantis is left with egg on his face over this one. Disney was wise in delaying the relocation of staff from California.
Marya says
Actually, it was all fine and well until Chapek opened his mouth and promised to take action to repeal Floridas law. A private company deciding to jump into politics and threaten to disrupt law in a state. Well, Disney doesn’t just reside in CA but FL too where CA politics don’t fly.
CRT says
I applaud removing Disney’s powers to govern itself. No other business in Florida has this privilege, so Disney should not either. I can see why the Reedy Creek Development District was needed 60 years ago when Disney first acquired the land to develop its business, not there should have been an expiration date added to the legislation. I am confident that Disney and its guests will be the ones paying for the bonds and the costs to service the Reedy Creek Development District. After all, they are the ones benefitting from the services.
Tina says
It wouldn’t surprise me if DeSantis waits until after the November elections to do anything. He through a temper tantrum and now has to deal with the repercussions.
Jennifer says
DeSantis is not the one that brought this bill forward. It had been in the works for a few years and dissolved all special districts that were established before Nov 5, 1968. Disney just happens to be one of them. They have the ability to ask that the special district be reinstated. You can bet that if it is more cost effective to have the special district, they will ask that it be reinstated.
Missy says
Disney and Reddy Creek can handle things just fine. Desantis needs to worry about other things and leave Disney alone.
barbara a fitzgerald says
Leave WDW alone Florida would still be a swamp with alligators if WDW hadn’t come down there
Robert Balderrama says
You know, if it’s something or a company from the state of California Florida isn’t going to like it’s way of running it’s business.